Which are the best 3 Wii games ever and why?

Zazz wrote:
No. NO. NEVER. NO ANIME CHARACTERS. Super Smash Bros is supposed to be a clash between VIDEO game characters.

@Kilik
The thing is, Smash was built as a party game in the first place, where luck counted for a lot. The randomness of the variations of strength in the items is supposed to make the "4" people playing feel like, "Damn, he got the item, better run away," or "YES! I got the Smash Ball! Feast on my AWESOMENESS!!"

Traditional competitive fighting games have 4 buttons for punches and kickes, and they are used for combos and such. Smash was supposed to be a different kind of fighting game, not a fighting game where once you were locked in someone's combo, you knew that you would die. No, Smash is different, hence the reason items, air dodging, rolling, etc exist.

The actual gameplay was never designed for combos. Think about it. Almost every aerial hits the opponent a certain distance, with the exception of those rapid spinning attacks. All tilts and smash attacks hit the opponent away, there might be a few tilts that don't, but the majority does. And because of the Smash Formula, the more damaged you are, the further away you go, that means combos can't really exist because everytime you hit the opponent, he'll go flying at a different distance, and timing + accuracy is what is needed for fighting game combos.

Plus, rapid spammy A attacks can be shielded + rolled out of, and they were in since the beginning of Smash. Laser gun locks and chain grabs were just things they never really tested because they didn't think people would ACTUALLY spam them that much.

Kilik 64 wrote:

Zazz wrote:
No. NO. NEVER. NO ANIME CHARACTERS. Super Smash Bros is supposed to be a clash between VIDEO game characters.

@Kilik
The thing is, Smash was built as a party game in the first place, where luck counted for a lot. The randomness of the variations of strength in the items is supposed to make the "4" people playing feel like, "Damn, he got the item, better run away," or "YES! I got the Smash Ball! Feast on my AWESOMENESS!!"

Traditional competitive fighting games have 4 buttons for punches and kickes, and they are used for combos and such. Smash was supposed to be a different kind of fighting game, not a fighting game where once you were locked in someone's combo, you knew that you would die. No, Smash is different, hence the reason items, air dodging, rolling, etc exist.

The actual gameplay was never designed for combos. Think about it. Almost every aerial hits the opponent a certain distance, with the exception of those rapid spinning attacks. All tilts and smash attacks hit the opponent away, there might be a few tilts that don't, but the majority does. And because of the Smash Formula, the more damaged you are, the further away you go, that means combos can't really exist because everytime you hit the opponent, he'll go flying at a different distance, and timing + accuracy is what is needed for fighting game combos.

Plus, rapid spammy A attacks can be shielded + rolled out of, and they were in since the beginning of Smash. Laser gun locks and chain grabs were just things they never really tested because they didn't think people would ACTUALLY spam them that much.

I understand that Smash was simplistic and not meant to be a hardcore fighter, but that does not justify the changes made from Melee. Melee had everything that you just said and turned out great. The game was PURPOSELY changed to be targetted for casual players. That's what I hate about it. 64 was for everyone. Melee was for everyone. Why is Brawl just for the average player that only picks up the game once in a while?